Image 01


Sylvoo Sylvoo
Wallpaper Other

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 4 comments

thnx ;) - Oct 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 4 comments

just improved version ;) - Oct 04 2007
Mist - Ensay

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments

OK, I still don't understand what is a problem.
I think kde-look is web space to share good wallpapers (and themes) with others. Not to share only Your own photos.
What You can say about themes?? Someone can make theme, next some other one based on it can make better version. So, better version is moust download, higher rated etc. It is bad to made better versions??
Another example: As all know Mac OSX have very nice design, themes etc (some thing the same about Vista ;) but no me). So many peopels try to made something similar. But some others peopels made oryginal themes. All share it here. So, someone who made oryginal theme can say something like You say: Oh, oh, not, not You only copy and spand small time on it, but I spend many mounts to made something new, so my theme is better and please don't put it here becose You spend to small time at work on it.
Your and similar argumentations are not understandable. kde-look is to share good wallpapers, themes, etc. It can be made by You or may be only shared by You. Only You must be legall.
I hope You understand I have right to put here my own or even Yours photos as wallpapers. You have the same right to take my wallpaper make improve it and put on kde-look. It is power of free (open) licenced arts and software. - Sep 29 2007
Mist - Ensay

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments

This peopel publlishing it on free (open) licence becouse like to give rights to others to distribute and modify.
So, I don't understand Your argument it is bad I redistribute it.
That is base off open source (free software, free art) community to give others rights to make derivatives and redistribute. Without this possibility whole community is nothing else like commersial corporation.
From my point of view every one who distribute something on free licence is happy when others redistribute it, make derivatives etc.
Your arguments are like Microsoft arguments. It is bad linux is free of charge, becouse we spend many time with developing Windows.
My motivation to made something for free community is not to show how I fantastic photo artist (for this are many photo blogs etc) but I like to give nice wallpapers, themes, etc. If they like it they download, if not like not download.
Important is to not brake license, what some peopel doing.

Hope You understand me. - Sep 27 2007
Mist - Ensay

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments

In reply to all the preceding speakers.
Yes, moust of wallpapers presentet here by me is based on photos not by me. But there is my work, all wallpapers are Gimped by me.
More over kde-look is not photoblog. So You have no right that all users must put here only their own photos.
At the end, I have permissions to redistribute this photos. All is on the one off free licences.

Sorry for my english. - Sep 27 2007

KDE 3.x Splash Screens by xactive 24 comments

OK, I work on new version in many colors and with oxygen icons.
I finish it in some days. - Sep 26 2007
500+ works of ART!

Wallpaper Other by themer 2 comments

Hi, nice collection, But, I'm half autor some of this pictures, and I see You break license. You can redistribute my wallpapapers but it must be write Licence or link to license text, and first of all You must add autor name with related file name (wallpaer file).
I'm happy You like my arts, but You must obey License. - Sep 13 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 11 comments

As I write in description it is based on photo by Lorrie McClanahan. So I only slightly GIMPed it, and it is not possible to make higher resolution, it look badly in 1600x1200. - Aug 18 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 11 comments

Hi, can You to prove it is realy art by Your wife? Sorry, if it is realy. But I download it from, and there this image is stored by Lorrie McClanahan with Creative Common License. That means I can make derivative and republish it with the same License. There is the link to page where I found oryginal art

So pleas send me some more info to prove this picture is not legal to put here. I understand it can be possible someone not legaly post it to on CC License but I must have some evidence to remove it from here. You know, anyone can tell its his art. - Aug 18 2007
Colors of Altiplano Boliviano

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 2 comments

Yes, I have rights to redistribute and to make modification to oryginal photo. This rights are from Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-2.5 License. As itr I write in description oryginal photo autor is Luca Galuzzi, and he decide to publish his photo on that license on
So I can do it, You can, and some one who wish ;) may rebublish it as long as You don't brake CC License.
But thanks for Your ask. I don't like when peopels brakes licences and oryginal author rights, too. It is not good for Open Source and Open Artists communitis. - Aug 05 2007
in the net

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 2 comments

Unfortuantly I can't tell You, becoase this photo is taked not by me. I just gimped it. - Jul 13 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 2 comments

You right, - Jul 12 2007

Wallpaper Other by rubasu 16 comments

Hi, it is very nice shot indid.
But when I look at oryginal picture at deviantart, their autor not Creative Coomons licensing it ;p So If You don't ask him = You have not permissions to republish it.
I know, I know, many my arts here are redisigned and republished from others arts but always I ask or check there is license agreement to republish. It is very nice when autors publishing ther arts on free license, but if they not publish and not clearly write permissions to republishing arts by others = they not like to republish theirs arts. - Jul 01 2007
strawberry in water

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 3 comments

OK, no problem :) if You wish - Jun 22 2007

KDM3 Themes by xactive 9 comments

I have no widescreen LCD so I can't try that it works properly ;( - Jun 02 2007