


Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments
I think kde-look is web space to share good wallpapers (and themes) with others. Not to share only Your own photos.
What You can say about themes?? Someone can make theme, next some other one based on it can make better version. So, better version is moust download, higher rated etc. It is bad to made better versions??
Another example: As all know Mac OSX have very nice design, themes etc (some thing the same about Vista ;) but no me). So many peopels try to made something similar. But some others peopels made oryginal themes. All share it here. So, someone who made oryginal theme can say something like You say: Oh, oh, not, not You only copy and spand small time on it, but I spend many mounts to made something new, so my theme is better and please don't put it here becose You spend to small time at work on it.
Your and similar argumentations are not understandable. kde-look is to share good wallpapers, themes, etc. It can be made by You or may be only shared by You. Only You must be legall.
I hope You understand I have right to put here my own or even Yours photos as wallpapers. You have the same right to take my wallpaper make improve it and put on kde-look. It is power of free (open) licenced arts and software. - Sep 29 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments
So, I don't understand Your argument it is bad I redistribute it.
That is base off open source (free software, free art) community to give others rights to make derivatives and redistribute. Without this possibility whole community is nothing else like commersial corporation.
From my point of view every one who distribute something on free licence is happy when others redistribute it, make derivatives etc.
Your arguments are like Microsoft arguments. It is bad linux is free of charge, becouse we spend many time with developing Windows.
My motivation to made something for free community is not to show how I fantastic photo artist (for this are many photo blogs etc) but I like to give nice wallpapers, themes, etc. If they like it they download, if not like not download.
Important is to not brake license, what some peopel doing.
Hope You understand me. - Sep 27 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 9 comments
Yes, moust of wallpapers presentet here by me is based on photos not by me. But there is my work, all wallpapers are Gimped by me.
More over kde-look is not photoblog. So You have no right that all users must put here only their own photos.
At the end, I have permissions to redistribute this photos. All is on the one off free licences.
Sorry for my english. - Sep 27 2007

Wallpaper Other by themer 2 comments
I'm happy You like my arts, but You must obey License. - Sep 13 2007
So pleas send me some more info to prove this picture is not legal to put here. I understand it can be possible someone not legaly post it to flickr.com on CC License but I must have some evidence to remove it from here. You know, anyone can tell its his art. - Aug 18 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 2 comments
So I can do it, You can, and some one who wish ;) may rebublish it as long as You don't brake CC License.
But thanks for Your ask. I don't like when peopels brakes licences and oryginal author rights, too. It is not good for Open Source and Open Artists communitis. - Aug 05 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 2 comments
But when I look at oryginal picture at deviantart, their autor not Creative Coomons licensing it ;p So If You don't ask him = You have not permissions to republish it.
I know, I know, many my arts here are redisigned and republished from others arts but always I ask or check there is license agreement to republish. It is very nice when autors publishing ther arts on free license, but if they not publish and not clearly write permissions to republishing arts by others = they not like to republish theirs arts. - Jul 01 2007

Wallpaper Other by sylvoo 3 comments